Our Blog

Archive for the ‘Innovation’ Category

Technology in 2015: 4 Future Tech Trends

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010


Technology’s relentless charge into depths unknown shows no signs of slowing up, the huge advancements we have made in 2010 will start to look prehistoric in the very near future. So with that in mind I thought I would let you get ahead of the technology beast and give you a few trends that will be making the iPad look like a calculator in 5 years time!

Ubiquitous pillar providers
Google, Apple, Microsoft and Facebook will continue to dominate, the crucial difference in 2015 is that they will all start to become more alike in terms of what the services they offer.  In 5 years time each will structure themselves around some easily comparable pillar services:

  1. real time search
  2. rich media content in the form of music and video (with free and subscription models simultaneously)
  3. internet browsing
  4. data manipulation tools (office and media applications)

As a result of this convergence in terms of offer, each of the pillar providers will try to differentiate around hardware (where Apple will tend to lead), relevance (a Google stronghold), access to content (an Apple and Microsoft battleground), quality of product (again an Apple and Microsoft fight) and prevalence/ubiquity (a Facebook trait).

We will see a Facebook web browser and web search, Google begin syndication of media content, as well as Facebook office applications in the next couple of years.

Everything IP
The internet of things will continue to grow apace, and increasingly everything will have an IP address, internet capabilities will be built into electronic devices at the point of manufacture. Remote control and monitoring of household appliances is set to become commonplace in the next few years. We’re already setting our Sky+ boxes via our iPhones, by 2015 we’ll be controlling our heating, washing machines and ovens remotely.

Cloud living
By 2015 hard data storage will be a rarity. Using mobile devices, and fixed in-home and public portals we will plug into the cloud from anywhere to access our media content, personal data, finances and communications.

Ultimately we will have something resembling our own roving IP address, that we can use to plug into the system and access cloud data wherever we go. Financial connections will increasingly take the form of electronic transfer within the cloud between people or institutions along the lines of PayPal. This will see traditional banks will finding their role in everyday transactions severely reduced.

Netbooks are the harbinger of this age of cloud living, and ultra high speed mobile internet through the 4G network will make this experience a tangible reality.

Haptic navigation and manipulation
The trend for visual navigation systems as evidenced in devices like the iPhone and iPad, and browsing applications like Cool Iris, will continue to grow in significance. Cloud living is a key driver for the relevance of this trend – as our data becomes increasingly remote in the physical sense, tactile data manipulation helps us to retain a sense of connectedness, giving us a physical sense of interaction with our ‘stuff’.

Microsoft are poised to gain huge traction in this space with Project Natal for Xbox 360, a gestural hands-free gaming environment launching at the end of 2010, and the same 3D camera tracking technology that powers it will form the basis of browsing applications to access all manner of data, from searching the internet to surveying images.

The continued evolution of tablet technology is relevant here, as iPad style devices will become a convergent middle ground that will take over from both iPod-size and netbook-size devices, offering a combination of multi media player (audio, video, text), browsing and creativity.

Face: A Co-Created History – Part 3

Friday, March 5th, 2010

Picture 13

In the later stages of 2009 it was becoming clearer and clearer that research, innovation and planning should and could work together in a tighter environment. A continuous process needed to be adopted, as opposed to one based on silos; and consumers should sit in the heart of this process.

This idea was the seed for our hugely popular and controversial presentation, Do Brands Really Need Agencies. Within a packed room at London’s Groucho Club, brand managers and agency people ascended to listen to what this new adaptive approach could do for the industry. One of the agencies taking part in the conversation at the Groucho Club was our office mates and advertising gurus, Farm!

Farm agreed that the industry needed a shake up and that for brands and agencies to really understand the needs and wants of their consumers they would need to work with them, not at them.

In November 2009 we worked closely with Farm to help Skinny Cow develop ideas and create their latest advertising campaign – ‘Oh Yes You Can’. The collaboration took place online within Mindbubble and face-to-face with members of the brand team, Farm creatives and Mindbubble ladies all under the guidance of our robust methodology.

After the experience of collaborating and co-creating with Farm, we started to talk about how this partnership could become a permanent yet agile business model. Here the idea for the Co-Creation Hub was born and a new way of doing things began to take shape.

After hours of meetings, arguments, laughter and much deliberation The Co-Creation Hub London was brought to life. The Hub is a collective of organisations, academics and individuals who passionately believe in doing things ‘with’ people rather than ‘at’ people.

Picture 4

The Founding Members of The Co-Creation Hub, London

Alongside Face the other founding members of the Co-Creation Hub London are Farm, the advertising agency, which has co-created communications for Nestle’s Skinny Cow; Opticomm, the media planning agency; Touch of Mojo, the brand design agency; and thrudigital, the social media development agency. And, they are actively looking for organisations and individuals from different fields that share their way of thinking, to get involved and help develop the co-creation movement.

Andrew Needham, founding partner of Face, as well as group managing partner of Tangible Group London, a core division of Cello Group Plc, is one of the key instigators of The Hub:

“The Co-creation Hub – London recognises that social media isn’t simply another channel; it has fundamentally changed the way consumers interact with brands. We need a more collaborative, adaptive and continuous model of marketing – one that is based on the core co-creation principle of doing things with people not at them. We call it Adaptive Brand Planning. It is a model that will ultimately be better placed in helping our clients deal with the advent of social brands”

The Hub’s belief that great ideas can come from anywhere means there are huge untapped resources out there that can flourish in a co-creative environment. The Hub is looking for organisations and individuals from as diverse a field as possible who share the same co-creation driven way of thinking, whether that’s a manufacturer, an artist, a school or even a government.

The launch of the Hub coincides with the release of Axe Twist, the first 100% co-created product. In July 2008 we co-created with 16 core Axe consumers from the US & the UK to create a new fragrance based around ‘freshness’. The workshop, which took place in New York, was a huge success and saw the idea behind the product (a fragrance that changes from day to night), the name and the actual fragrance itself co-created. Twist hit the shelves in late 2009 and early signs are that it is performing well in the market.

The Co-Creation Hub is the next chapter in Face’s collaborative history and is set to be as innovative, fresh, open and disruptive as the last one.

Face: A Co-Created History – Part 2

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010
Screen shot 2010-03-03 at 11.02.40

Mindbubble was launched in 2008

At the beginning of 2008 Face’s online qualitative research communities began to gather pace. First, net giant Google teamed up with us to create a three-month immersive research community with teenagers. The community focused on the future & relevance of internet search and produced some amazing insights that are still thought highly of within Google. Following on from this Doritos commissioned us to create a community steering group with the intention of helping the brand open up their communication and develop a clear social media strategy for their ‘You Make It, We Play It’ crowd-sourcing campaign.

In the Summer of 2008 we worked alongside Tango in a combined online and face-to-face co-creation project. The aim was to define the planning and positioning of Tango for their 2009 re-launch. The project was successful and led to the release of ‘Tango With Added Tango’ in May 2009 and provided the backbone for the overall Save Tango campaign.

Tango With Added Tango - A Co-Created Product

By this time social media had spread across many demographics, and it was quickly learnt that co-creation could be applied to any audience, anywhere, at any time.

With this revelation firmly at the front of our mind we started to explore the relationship between women, technology and the internet. This exciting new space was already being asked about by clients who were interested in how they could use Face’s approach to get closer to women, the gatekeepers of family life. The result of our interrogation into this subject was the original Women & the Web 2.0 Report.

The results of this were astounding, much like youth in previous years, women were creating a niche for themselves, finding their own space on the web. The knock-on effect of the report saw Face engage a group of women both online and face-to-face to build the first co-creation community for women, Mindbubble!

It was an instant hit. Boots were the first brand to work alongside the Mindbubble ladies, co-creating new products for their make-up lines. Following in the footsteps of Boots came Surf, Knorr, Dove, Comfort and Air Wick, all wanting to harness the power of the opinionated and creative Mindbubble ladies.

Moving into 2009 and we did not rest on our laurels, the natural restlessness within the company lead to the development and launch of Face Wired. Designed to develop the potential of co-creation in the planning sphere, Wired immediately teamed up with The Carphone Warehouse to help develop their social media strategy. The Carphone project included the use of Pulsar, Face’s brand new real time research tool.

Pulsar is Face's Social Media Immersion Platform and Methodology

Pulsar enabled Carphone to get even closer to their consumers and listen to what people were saying online. The speed and accuracy of Pulsar meant that the results could immediately be plugged into innovation and planning movements.

By this time, the floodgates were open; the size of the team had quadrupled and Midford Place, Face’s headquarters, had become the epicentre of everything co-creation. Community, Social Media and Co-Creation projects were coming in thick and fast and as our ambitious goals were beginning to be reached, another organic step was taken, adapting the co-creation process for advertising.

Next up… Part 3: Say Hello to The Hub

The Future Planning

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

“The ad industry establishment can no longer simply tweak its offering around the edges if it is to cope. 2010 must be the year to begin a head on overhaul of the way the (advertising) business is organized” Claire Beale Editor of Campaign Magazine, January 2010

The global marketing landscape has changed more in the last 5 years than in the last 50 but that the leading agencies in terms of the way they are organized, structured and the service they offer, haven’t.

The main driver for this change has been the rise of empowered consumers. They have exposed the traditional advertising agency model as one that is out of date and struggling to help clients deal with the current consumer landscape.

“The fact is: consumers now control brands. They play with them, reshape them and even imbue them with new meaning. In the next decade, we will see a shift away from the traditional branding model of agencies and clients” Owen Lee, Creative Chairman Farm

The big question on everyone’s lips is how should the advertising and planning industry respond? What is the new model of marketing that will ensure as an industry we can help brands to navigate their way through the new consumer landscape? These questions apply as much to the brands as to the agencies that serve them. If we wanted to be sensationalist we would say that “brands and agencies must adapt or die” or putting it in a more positive way that the brand and agency leaders of the future will need to be fleet-of-foot and structure their businesses to function in a highly fluid way.

As research, brand and communications people we always felt we wanted to get closer to consumers, but for practical reasons were not able to no matter how creative we were. But now that’s all changing. Social media allows us to listen to consumers and monitor the conversations they are having around brands in real time. This offers valuable insight and understanding, but more importantly identifies opportunities to establish a completely new way for brands to engage with their audiences. The challenge for the industry is not to view social media as a channel, but to use it to facilitate collaborations between brands and consumers to innovate and co-create communications more effectively. It has heralded:

The Advent of Social Brands
New social media tools will help brands to be on 24/7: this is part of what we call “the socialisation of brands” where campaign and channel marketing gives way to “continuous brand engagement marketing”. The environment the brand lives and breathes in is always on and is always changing so brands need to be listening to and observing their consumers not just in communities but also on the web as well as involving them on a continuous basis in everything they do.

The Need for Big Social Ideas
“Big ideas” need to be a big SOCIAL ideas – one that has the power to live and breathe through what consumers do with it in their interactions with each other and the brand. A big social idea has to be able to evolve, adapt and gain new meaning through those consumer interactions. Ultimately this requires agencies and brands to embrace a more open creative approach based on the philosophy that ideas can come from anywhere: a new model which combines the creativity of experts with the creativity of consumers so that more big social ideas of better quality can be produced. This means experts have an even bigger role to play than ever before. Our recent case study with Nestle’s Skinny Cow where we co-created the advertising with Mindbubble women is a good one – in three months there are already 41,000 fans on Facebook.

The Need to be Fast, Adaptive and Continuous
The process needs to change as well; the annual planning cycle making way for real-time planning which allows brands to remain relevant and interesting to changing consumer needs, overall a more fluid, highly responsive and iterative way of planning, which we call Adaptive Brand Planning. The new imperative will be to maintain a dialogue with your consumers to harness their opinions and ideas to fine-tune your product and communications. One of the main benefits of this approach is the speed with which you can develop concepts and communications as shown by our recent work with Unilever and Axe/Lynx Twist.

Screen shot 2010-03-02 at 16.06.48

Consumer Communities Will Reign
The focus on the 30 second TV spot will give way to the content and conversations that are being generated by consumers and between consumers around the brand. This will in turn produce different segmentation models where brands see consumers not just as potential customers who want to buy something from them but as people who want to have a relationship with them. Engaging and managing brand fan bases will be key: developing creative ways for engaging and managing fan bases will be critical.

A New Planning Mindset
The planner of the future will be more interested in how people interact, and how to stimulate those interactions. The sage-like planners will be replaced by people who are comfortable working in tightly knit teams of agency planners, each with their area of specialism such as social media or building and harnessing the power of communities. The line between planner and researcher will become blurred because there will be a constant dialogue with consumers that will offer insight, understanding and ideas in real time. A key part of the task will be to observe and spot these insights and ideas and use them to inspire creative experts to build upon them.

Conclusion
Consumers will be treated in a fundamentally different way. They will be given more responsibility and will be more involved throughout the brand marketing process. Co-creating with consumers as direct and active equals to deliver a range of marketing outputs will be a major part of the marketing model. Also the new generation of planners will treat consumers in a fundamentally different way. The gaming generation of young planners will be comfortable in this fast changing environment, where remaining in constant contact with your audience is more important than one-off research interventions. These planners will be the architects of a new contract between brand and consumer, founded on listening, understanding, adapting and co-creating.

Co-Create London

Friday, February 26th, 2010

London is one of the biggest cities in the world; it is a massive player in the worlds finance, fashion, business, party, retail and social media industries. It’s a place where dreams can be made and literally anything can happen! But even though London has an unlistable amount of good points and amazing opportunities, it’s not perfect.

Co-Create London is a new website aiming to address London’s main issues and annoyances by listening to the people who know the city best – the general public.

Whether you have lived in London for your whole life or just passed through Co-Create London would like you to answer a very simple question ‘What Would You Do To Make London a Better Place?’ By gathering ideas, solutions and fresh thinking about the city the site hopes to address issues that are important to people of London and give citizens the platform to make positive changes.

Over the next few weeks the site will be collecting ideas and encouraging users to vote on their favourites. The ideas that receive the most votes will be taken forward into a co-creation workshop. The workshop will see Londoners who contributed to the cocreatelondon.com website come together with London experts to turn the ideas into positive and real solutions.

These solutions will then be marched to Town Hall and presented in front of London Mayor Boris Johnson. The hope is that Bojo will listen to Co-Create London and the ideas taken from the website will become a reality, making London a better place to visit and live.

To let Boris know exactly what you would do to make London a better place – or just read & vote on some great ideas, head over to www.cocreatelondon.com

Check out the Co-Create London video below!

Introducing the London Co-Creation Hub

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

The Co-creation Hub is a collective of organisations, academics and individuals who believe in doing things ‘with’ people rather than ‘at’ people.

We currently work in the research, branding and communications industry, but we think our approach can be applied to any number of industries and organisations in order to solve almost any problem.

We believe great ideas can come from anywhere and anyone. And that means there is a huge untapped resource of creativity out there that co-creation can allow to flourish.

We have already co-created new products for Unilever, advertising campaigns for Nestle and communications strategies for Carphone Warehouse and seen startling results.

Consumers now control brands. They play with them, re-shape them and even imbue them with new meaning. And the successful brands and businesses of the future will put co-creation at the heart of everything they do and treat people as active equals rather than passive respondents.

At its core, the Co-creation Hub is about collaboration. We believe in involving people at every stage of everything we do. We find out what people think, what they like to talk about, what products they actually want to buy and how they would like to be spoken to. And then we co-create our work with them rather than ‘target’ them. That way, the work we produce engages more people, resonates more deeply and actively encourages people to play with our ideas.

Whether manufacturers, artists, writers, designers or government organisations, The Co-Creation Hub – London is looking to collaborate with people from around the world involved in co-creation, whatever their discipline, to stimulate the co-creation approach.

The London Co-Creation Hub website

Face 2010: From The Rebirth of Insight, to The Death of PowerPoint

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

At Face we don’t like standing still; partly because we are always looking to improve and do things better, and partly because as the world changes we need to change with it. 2010 will be no different, and we are bursting with new ideas for products, communities & projects. Here are our predictions about the research & innovation business in 2010, and a sneak preview of some of the things Face will be up to.

1. 2010 the year when research goes truly mobile as smart phones become commonplace and research on the go starts to catch up

Face will be developing a smart phone application that allows us to conduct research more effectively on the go and in real time

2. The year when the research industry embraces & empowers consumers as researchers, to truly reach the parts that researchers cannot reach – peer2peer research shows what the industry looks like turned inside out.

Through our communities Headbox & Mindbubble we are training consumers to act as researchers within their own peer groups going undercover and asking the questions we didn’t even know we needed to ask.

3. The year when Tech Research & Innovation begins to learn from FMCG research in terms of innovation and product development. Why? Because the consumer is now the subject & not the object of technology.

Face is launching our own tech community in 2010, aimed at engaging tech leaders in insight and innovation work

4. The year that social media & the web as a source of insight is finally taken seriously. Everyone wakes up to the fact that the greatest source of data is around us all the time – it’s just a case of harnessing it. No more excuses.

Face launches 2 new real time research products – Pulsar Snapshot & Pulsar Tracker – designed to monitor and analyse conversations and interactions around brands & categories in real time.

5. Co-creation & communities go east – increased confidence in the methodologies takes them firmly out of the west and into Eastern Europe, Russia, Asia & South Pacific

Face is launching community platforms & co-creation projects in India & Australia, building on existing platforms in China, Russia, Thailand, Philippines & Indonesia.

6. Death by Powerpoint becomes death of Powerpoint, slowly, slowly. One day soon. We won’t be crying.

Face will be emphasizing visual clarity & simplicity in terms of outputs and making more and more of our debriefs / output material available online as an ongoing treasure trove for clients

7. The year that the industry embraces communities in their ongoing insight, innovation & planning cycles, enabling them to work in the real world as their brands become as social as the people consuming them are!

Face has developed an adaptive brand planning process that helps Insight, Planners & Marketing people to keep their brand planning dynamic, organic and always on!

8. The year of the rebirth of insight. Researchers realise that processes like Co-Creation, Communities & Crowd-sourcing are not just there to play with, but are serious methods of getting better result, especially in the day in day out job of getting clients closer to their customers.

Face is doubling the size of its insight teams and putting actionable insight at the heart of everything we do

So, 2010, some big challenges & quite a journey ahead but a truly exciting time for us and the industry as a whole. Look forward to going on that journey with you.

Unilever Global CMI Conference – Windsor

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

After years of enjoying being briefed by clients on their insight & innovation needs we at Face finally got to turn the tables yesterday and set a room full of senior client insight people one BIG challenge.  At 3.30pm Face interrupted a Unilever Global CMI conference and sent delegates scurrying out into the streets of Windsor and crawling the web to get some hands on insights in the world of Oral Care. It was all just for fun, but it was great to see a group of senior people from Unilever not only interviewing each other & getting out on the street but also fully engaging with YouTube, Twitter, a variety of blogs and engaging with content produced by our own Mind-bubble women.  There were a few cheeky calls to dentists, some great mother & child interviews on the streets and the shelves of local Boots and Tesco Express were stripped  of toothpaste.   All that was missing in the room was having consumers there in the room to work with us and get directly and actively involved in the process, but as we had plenty of mums and dads in the room, there was plenty of home truths available!

It all just showed how much can be achieved by a focused group of people in a short space of time, and how much resource there is avaible all of the time for us as research community to tap into. We can’t reveal too much about any of the outcomes, but it generated a lot of energy, enthusiasm and a huge amount of competitiveness.  The final output from each team was a 2 minute film capturing their insights and the journey they went on to get there.  By the time you read this the winning team will have already been announced and with Oscar season upon us soon, the likes of Cameron, Clooney & Eastwood might be starting to feel a bit anxious about their chances this year.

For those of you who were at the session and took part in making the films, you can go and watch them all by clicking on the following link  <http://www.facegroup.co.uk/global-cmi-conference>. You will need the password you have been sent by email!

Thanks to all who took part for their commitment and making it such a fun session.

Tweeting From The Front Line

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

haiti

No one can have escaped the total devastation that has afflicted Haiti over the past week. It is a situation that is almost too hard for the majority of people around the world to comprehend. It has become readily apparent that people on the ground are in dire need of key resources, as well as exposure in order to help find the thousands of missing people in Port-au-Prince and beyond. With the majority of formal lines of communication down, social media has had a significant role to play in facilitating donations and giving a voice to people on the ground. CNN’s iReport platform is currently putting together a database to help connect people with loved ones in Haiti by calling upon people to post names and upload photos of people who may be missing. Similarly, the twitter hashtag #rescuemehaiti is being used to direct rescue efforts to where trapped survivors have been located. The Haiti Earthquake Support Center has also created a crowd sourcing app to “harness the power of the crowd to help locate and identify missing persons with just a few minutes of your time”.

These are all powerful examples of how social media can be harnessed in ways that can have a positive effect and, potentially, save lives. The past year has been punctuated by similar examples where social media has had a role to play in giving people a voice and bringing about some form of action – from student protests in Iran, to the PCC investigating Jan Moir’s article about Stephen Gately in The Daily Mail. With all these examples in mind, it begs the question: is social media coming of age as a force for good?

A key criticism that has been levelled at social media is that, whilst it allows people to easily show their support for a variety of causes or social issues, this does not often lead to tangible action. What does pledging your support for a cause on Facebook really mean in actual terms? Is this a viable alternative to good old-fashioned physical collectives of people? Moreover, does this ultimately lead to people doing less than they would before, with digital support becoming a replacement for physical action? These have all been valid criticisms of the role of social media in political and social causes and crises.

However, are we now seeing the first signs of how social media content can translate into tangible positive action? The proliferation of tech startups focused on social innovation would indicate this is the case. A key example of this is Ushahidi, a simple website mashup using user generated reports and Google Maps to gather citizen-generated information. It has already proved invaluable in mapping reports of violence and peace efforts in Kenya, reporting activity in Gaza for Al Jazeera and monitoring the voting system in India. Ushahidi exemplifies the benefits that the real-time and flexible nature of social media can deliver in emergency and conflict situations.

For now, this is still probably a question of watch this space, but hopefully this heralds the dawn of the positive role that social media can play in such situations.

Related Links:

The Ushahidi Haiti feed

Some great stuff from Wired on Haiti and ‘Disaster Relief 2.0’


The Open 100

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

The guys over at http://www.openbusiness.cc are running a competition that allows you to nominate your top open companies/organizations/platforms in the world. The Open 100 celebrates the power of openness and mass collaboration. The competition was born out of the UK’s National Endowment for Science Technology and the Arts (NESTA) search for the world’s top 100 open innovation organizations. Now it is being opened up to you to find who the world’s best open innovators really are. You can nominate those companies you think are the best deserving to appear on the list of the best and most interesting open businesses at http://www.openbusiness.cc/category/directory/.

You might wonder what we actually mean what we mean by open organizations? While there is no clear-cut definition of ‘openness’ there is undeniably a trend to democratize and de-centralize previously closed business processes as the lines between consumers and producers blur. Increasingly companies are opening up their innovation and production processes. Some are formed from the start around communities as with Face, while others are opening up their intellectual property to share with others. This promises better, faster and more efficient innovation.

Lego, hoping to be part of The Open 100

Lego, hoping to be part of The Open 100

Roland Harwood of NESTA responded to the idea that open innovation is bandied around as a phrase too much, suggesting that the techniques will eventually just drop the word ‘open’ as it becomes more the norm. “It’s over-hyped and has been used and misused but the trends that underpin it are only going to increase. Open innovation is being prioritized at a senior level in organizations. Leaders like its promise of creating value quicker, cheaper, faster,” said Harwood to Businessweek. “But it’s the middle managers and heads of departments who have the responsibility for implementing this. They’re struggling for the right processes and business models and they don’t know where to start. That’s where the gap is. The strategic argument has been won; now it’s a pragmatic challenge.” The practice is always so much more difficult than the theory.

A month into the competition and there are a varied mixture of organizations and platforms nominated. Major telecommunications companies like BT, Nokia and Orange are nominated for their open innovation approach. Collaboratively made films like Faintheart,and El Cosmonauta as well as a Creative Commons based film production company are also nominated. Household name web startups like Firefox, Twitter, Flickr, Google, Ebay and Facebook have been put forward as well as the smaller but equally important web services that focus on the environment like Akvo and Pachube.

International megabrands such as Lego, Virgin Atlantic, Tesco, IBM and Dell are also in the running with open innovation and openhardware communitites like Harkopen and Openp2pdesign.org. There are also 3 nominations for the band Nine Inch Nails for their pioneering transparent and co-created approach (nomination 1, 2, 3).

Nine Inch Nails released their album, The Slip, online last year as a free download

In 2009 Nine Inch Nails released their album, The Slip, as a free download

Nominated companies for ‘The Open 100’ can fall into the following categories:

Open Innovation│ Crowdsourcing │ Co-creation │ Open Source Software │Open Hardware│ Open Business (includes web 2.0)

And they will need to do some of the following…

∟ innovate products or services through communities

∟ share information for free using alternative ‘open copyright models’

∟ give substantial parts of a product or service away for free

∟ operate organizationally like open source software production, but translate the model to services

∟ lowering the costs of market entry by providing tools or services, that ‘open’ up traditional business boundaries

Public nomination will close on the 12th of February and the panel of judges will then choose the winner from each category. The panel of judges includes: Vic Keegan (technology correspondent Guardian), Marc Surman (director Mozilla Foundation), Roland Harwood (director Open Innovation at NESTA), David Simoes-Brown (head of Corporate Open Innovation at NESTA) and Andrew Gaule (found of the H-I Network and leader of the Network for Innovation and Strategic Growth). The winners will be announced on the 24th of February at the ‘Open 4 Business’ conference at NESTA and at http://www.openbusiness.cc/. The winners will have the privilege of being published through NESTA and The Guardian Open Platform in the ultimate collection of open organizations; ‘The Open100’. Help celebrate the benefits of openness by nominating your favourite organizations or platforms at:

http://www.openbusiness.cc/category/directory/

Follow The Open 100 on Twitter at:

http://twitter.com/TheOpen100

Check out Face’s entry to The Open 100:

http://www.openbusiness.cc/2010/01/21/face/

Open Innovation according to Joi Ito

Friday, December 18th, 2009

Last night @joi Ito gave a talk about Open Innovation at the Italian Parliament in Rome. I am in Rome right now but I didn’t make it to the Parliament yesterday and followed the talk through the online streaming.

As Joi Ito says on his blog, “It was an interesting time to be talking to the Italian Parliament, Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi having recently been attacked with a statuette of the Milan cathedral by Massimo Tartaglia causing the government to go after Facebook where Tartagalia’s fan pages was ordered to be shut down. Four Google executives are on trial in Italy for criminal charges for allowing an offensive video to be posted to Google Video.”

Needless to say, not many MPs were there, and the ones who attended were mainly concerned with defending their political views rather than discussing open innovation, the topic of the night. One of them, Antonio Palmieri, from Berlusconi’s party, went as far as saying that “to write good laws one doesn’t necessarily have to be an expert on the specific field/topic the law is going to apply to” [the web in this case]. Makes sense, right?

Nonetheless Joi Ito delivered a solid and insightful talk about what open innovation is, why it matters, what are the pillars of open innovation and what are the challenges ahead. And I think this last bit was the most important take away of the night. We massively reduced the barriers [friction] to connectivity and information exchange thanks to the Internet Protocol and the World Wide Web. We also managed to reduce the level of friction from a legal point of view thanks to frameworks like Creative Commons which allow us to share stuff legally. Now the next big challenge the web and open innovation are up against is not connectivity, nor the law: it’s politics.

Here’s the Prezi. Enjoy.

You can follow @joi on twitter, and read his blog here http://joi.ito.com/

A Hybrid Model for Open Innovation

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

Slides up from last Friday’s Open Hardware conference at Nesta Hq. It was a really interesting day, engaging conversations and some (telling) arguments! All in all, It was very useful for me to reflect on the differences between the co-creation and crowdsourcing models on one side and the opensource model/community on the other side.

Most of the friction seemed to emerge around two cornerstones of co-creation: 1) rewarding the people involved in the process 2) involving consumers as active equals, at the same level of designers, coders and creatives.

The idea of rewarding the people involved in the co-creation project with incentives (cash or prizes) was seen by some as a deal-breaker: it “kills the magic of the collaboration” and outsmarts the “love” element in the motivation. But I think since most brands are nowhere near the idea of giving away their IP and go opensource, it is fair and crucial to reward the people involved for their time and effort.

It also makes sense to remember that a big part of the opensource workforce is made of paid developers (just think about Mozilla) and I would argue that certainly they mustn’t love their job less because they get paid to work on something they consider a cause. So, I think cash doesn’t exclude love/glory/fun. As a matter of fact it probably multiplies the three of them. Or at least it would in my case (if it wasn’t clear enough already).

The second friction-generator was the idea of involving in the process consumers/users at the same level as designers/coders/creatives. Some of the coders involved thought that (non-skilled) consumers/users should just be involved as testers, once the strategic and creative work has been done by “the experts”.

This is a kind of resistance we encounter quite often over any co-creation process. It may vary in degree but the idea of having non-skilled consumers coming up with ideas and “tasking” skilled developers/designers/creatives doesn’t go down well. So, it wasn’t big news, but what surprised me was that this resistance was coming from people that live and breath in the open source world.

So I decided to dig it up. And after discussing and arguing the various points, pint after pint, one of the explanations I was given is that the open source collaboration process is based on a principle of equal contribution while the co-creation one is potentially asymmetric. So if you’re not contributing enough to the open source community, or as much as the others, you’re not going to be taken seriously and you shouldn’t have the right to be tasking other users. But again, if I look at how opensource communities work I’m not sure symmetry and equal contribution are religiously observed. Also, the presence of paid developers in the open source community kind of compromise the “equal contribution” argument.

All in all, I think it’s important to have different types of co-creators, with different sets of skills, contributing to different stages of the process in different ways. Throwing them all together without a structure, a solid process and diversified roles it’s just not going to fly. And that’s why leadership is so important for any opensource community.

Do Brands Really Need Agencies?

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

Following on from the success of our Web 2.0 Women forum earlier this year we thought it was about time we opened up another hot topic for debate. The last Face Forum revolved around the key question ‘Do Brands Need Agencies?’ On the 18th of November we have been joined by friends, experts and clients at the Groucho club to discuss what it takes to stay relevant and true to your consumers, how to engage the crowds in research innovation and planning and what are some of the tech trends for 2010 and beyond. Here’s a quick summary:

Relevance
The real-time social web has changed the way we communicate giving us the tools to get and share information at a pace we have not experienced before. This has made the web the richest insight field we have ever had. How can you harness the power of the world wide wave for research, brand planning and brand engagement? What are real-time research and adaptive brand planning? And how can they help your brand stay relevant?

Crowds
Barely a day goes by without a website, campaign or competition cropping up, promising to harness the collective wisdom of crowds for the benefit of brands. Peperami even ditched Lowe to ask the crowds. But is bottom-up really enough? When did crowdsourcing cease to be a means to an end and become an end in itself? Join us to discuss a hybrid model where crowd-sourcing and co-creation are used as complementary methodologies.

Trends
We asked 3000 19 to 25 years old young adults about their consumption habits, media and tech diet. The Forum will be the place where we present our latest Techtribe report, uncovering youth trends that will soon start migrating to other audiences

It was a great night! Here’s the presentation that kick-started the discussion, join in and tell us what you think

Co-Creation Will Create a New Breed of Agency

Monday, November 16th, 2009

Following my blog Co-Creation is Driving Change in the Way We Work here are my thoughts on how co-creation is creating a new breed of agency where the disciplines of research, innovation, social media and advertising/communications are coming together in a more seamless way under one roof.

Co-creation and its underlying philosophy whereby consumers want to have things done with them rather than at them will ultimately usher in a new breed of agency. There are several reasons for this:-

1) Consumers have replaced trust in advertising with trust in individuals: in particular, friends, family, and colleagues. Turning to communities and away from mass media, consumers are increasingly making traditional advertising more irrelevant. They have learned to block the ads they don’t want, and gate-keeping is becoming more sophisticated and widespread: according to Forrester Research DVR ownership in North America, which features ad-skipping, will grow from 19% of households in 2006 to 55% in 2011. More than half of UK consumers using the Internet at home utilize spam and popup blockers to filter unwanted messages from their online experiences, and countries like the Netherlands, France, and Germany are not far behind.

2) Consumers want to be more involved with the brands and products they consume: this applies also to the way they are communicated to them through advertising. Doritos is the most famous example in the UK whereby consumers were invited via a competition to create the next TV campaign. More recently Unilever’s Peperami have dropped Lowe to Crowdsource their next ad campaign with consumers. Noam Buchalter marketing manager at Peperami says: “We believe Peperami is a brand that deserves radical creative solutions and are confident taking our brief out to thousands rather than a small team of “creatives” will provide us with the best possible idea and take our advertising to the next level.”

3) Consumers are showing in increasing numbers that they prefer pull to push: almost all consumers own a PC and mobile phone, and they spend almost half of their media time with interactive channels. Use of RSS and podcasts has increased to 10% and 14%, respectively, from virtually nothing in 2003. Mark Earls author of Herd, says that it is no longer about what your brand does to the consumer but what consumers are doing to and with your brand. Putting it another way, James Murdoch in his Marketing Society Annual Lecture said ‘Ubiquitous connectivity means fundamentally that the individual becomes the agent of everything…we’ve learnt through experience what difference the new empowered world means for our relationship with customers. This is not a question of scale. It is a different way of existing’.

4) Different ways of existing means there is more fragmentation: which in turn is driving more complexity. The number of media channels available to marketers, agencies, and consumers has exploded. Proliferation of choice offers marketers new opportunities, such as social networks, mobile, and branded entertainment. Social media, in which consumers become publishers and media outlets drives media buyers crazy; there are more than 59 million videos in YouTube today, and they can’t cut deals with every blogger.

5) A new marketing funnel is required. The current one which sits at the heart of most current advertising and media buying agencies is out of date. “Integrated” or “360” marketing is still an excuse to sell campaign ideas as brand ideas so that they can produce a TV commercial and shoe horn other channels in afterwards. Consumers need to be at the heart of a new marketing model so that we can move away from channel marketing to “continuous brand engagement” marketing.

6) A new definition of “mass media” is emerging: More and more consumers are creating their own content and are coming together to form communities around it. Personal profiles on sites like Myspace, Bebo and Facebook don’t simply state vital statistics, they allow marketers access to preferences, allegiances, recommendations and conversations they could not have dreamed of even five years ago. And there are communities for every niche, so the same data richness can be experienced for every specific brand, sector or topic. It is always up to date being spontaneously added to by consumers. The new mass media is made up of a collection of communities. As more consumers become involved in social media, these platforms will grow and eclipse today’s mainstream media.

7) Traditional advertising can’t deliver a captive audience in this new consumer landscape: Nearly a quarter of marketers polled by Ipsos Mori for the Chartered Institute of Marketing’s latest Marketing Trends survey said advertising, excluding online, gave the worst return on investment. Almost a quarter of marketers rated CRM as the best, with PR activities coming in second highest in terms of ROI.


In the New Breed of Agency:

Consumers will be treated in a fundamentally different way: They will be given more responsibility and will be more involved throughout the brand marketing process. Co-creating with consumers as direct and active equals to deliver a range of marketing outputs will be part of its core philosophy.

Consumer communities will reign: The focus on the 30 second TV spot will give way to the content and conversations that are being generated by consumers and between consumers around the brand. This will in turn produce different segmentation models where brands see consumers not just as potential customers who want to buy something from them but as people who want to have a relationship with them.

New social media tools will help brands to be on 24/7: this is part of what we call at Face “the socialisation of brands” where campaign and channel marketing gives way to “continuous brand engagement marketing”. The environment the brand lives and breathes in is always on and is always changing so brands need to be listening to and observing their consumers not just in communities but also on the web as well as involving them on a continuous basis in everything they do.

Engaging and managing brand fan bases will be key: Developing creative ways for engaging and managing fan bases will be critical to the New Breed proposition. As Marmite and Peperami have shown involving consumers through co-creation and crowdsourcing respectively in what a brand says and does is a great way of driving brand engagement with important fan bases.

The arrival of research 3.0: new social media tools and web 2.0 are helping brands to research consumers in more exciting and different ways through mass collaboration and intimate co-creation. Combined with new ways of accumulating robust qualitative data which we can make sense of from the web, then research has an exciting future ahead of it. It will herald a new era – Research 3.0.

Ideas can come from anywhere: a new model which combines the creativity of experts with the creativity of consumers so that more ideas of better quality can be produced is on its way. In the New Breed Agency, experts have an even bigger role to play than ever before. The researchers, the designers, the marketers, the copywriters, the art directors, the account men, the planners will become facilitators, analysts, curators, editors, creative directors and publishers. Their role is critical to ensuring that the overall creative output is polished and of an extremely high standard.

A mix of old and new: the new breed of agency will exist both in a virtual capacity and the real world – consumers will not only feel comfortable hanging out in the agency as part of continuous co-creation programmes but their content will also be streamed live onto TV screens. The processes and methodologies of this new agency will also reflect a combination of the old and new. This will be done not just for the sake of it but because it delivers better ROI.

Talent resides in and outside the company: the new breed of agency will be less worried with employing everybody they work with. It recognises that the best talent can come from both inside and outside the company. This will also be reflected in more collaborative and flexible working practices.

Co-creation in the USA Part 1: When Daniel Met Barack & Ann.

Friday, November 13th, 2009
Obama upstaged by a Nose!

Obama upstaged by a Nose!

As Sean, Lucy & I headed in Chicago for a co-creation project last week there wasn’t much sign of Mr President in his home town; but it didn’t take long for him to rear his head in the workshop. During the introductions, Daniel, a true all American guy told us that he had come face to face with the new president following the election night celebrations. Now that was pretty exciting, and Daniel was still buzzing over it a year later.

But that excitement was superceeded by the excitement he felt in coming face to face in the workshop with Ann Gottlieb, Fragrance Queen & creator of CK One, who was there in the workshop to stimulate and engage with a bunch of straight up Chicago guys talking about deodorans & fragrances. You wouldn’t expect Daniel to know or even care what Ann had to say about fragrance (or vice versa), but something in the experience really got him excited (”wow, I never thought I would be in the room with an actual real life ‘nose’”) and got the whole workshop going! Such are the joys of co-creation, and an important lesson learnt; that creativity and creation is really & truly stimulated by the mingling & collaboration of many different people and perspectives – often completely different in background, experience & perspective.

There is no one guaranteed recipe for co-created innovation success, but how about this for starters. Take one Daniel (all American guy), add one Ann (world-renowned fragrance expert), mix together thoroughly, sprinkle in some brand magic and serve over Chicago ice. Just perfect. Who needs Mr Obama?

Next up on my travels – San Francisco, say tuned!!

Face at Open Hardware Conference – London, December 4th 2009

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

0624makers

40Fires and Nesta have announced the Open Hardware Conference, which will take place in the Nesta offices in London on the 4th December 2009 between 10am and 8 in the evening:

Collaborative Strategies and Challenges of Making Things the Open Source Way

This is an event to bring key projects, their participants and stakeholders together in the emerging field of Open Hardware development, organized by 40Fires in partnership with Nesta.

The 40Fires Foundation is a forum to develop energy-efficient cars, and other sustainable products, using an open source approach.

The event aims to inform participants about Open Hardware, to be a space to discuss and learn and to explore practical solutions and potential collaborations to help Open Hardware work better, for a better world.

Confirmed speakers include Christian Alhert of Minibar and Open Business fame, Alexandra Deschamps-Sonsino of Tinker.it and I‘m going from Face. Patrick Andrews of Riversimple/40 Fires will be talking about The Hyrban, the Open Source car, Adrian Bowyer about the RepRap Project and its Community, Andrew Katz will discuss A framework for open licensing of hardware and I’m going to discuss a hybrid approach (bottom-up and top-down) to open innovation.

Should be a cracking day, join us!

Bottom up is not enough: the case for a hybrid model

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

As Hugh Jordan wrote on Brand-e recently, “Barely a day goes by without a website, campaign or competition cropping up, promising to harness the collective wisdom of crowds for the benefit of brands.” Consumer generated inputs are playing a more and more prominent role into research, innovation and planning. However, it is still not very clear what are the most suitable approaches, frameworks and methodologies available for for doing this.

This presentation, recently discussed at a number of conferences in the UK, Spain and Italy, looks in particular at crowd-sourcing and co-creation: why to use them, when to use them, what are the advantages, the drawbacks and the workarounds, what are the deliverables and how could these grassroots practices fit into the existing marketing process.

Using crowd-sourcing and co-creation as complementary frameworks is key to harness the wisdom of the crowds both at an individual and group-thinking level, bringing together bottom up and top down approaches, online and offline, to make sure the richness provided by mass collaboration is effectively shaped and leveraged by informed strategic thinking and expert insight.

Previously on the Hybrid approach:

The bottom is not enough – Kevin Kelly
http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/02/the_bottom_is_n.php

Hybrids: Architectures For The Ecology of Co-Creation
http://www.joelamantia.com/social-media/hybrids-architectures-for-the-ecology-of-co-creation

Why experts should not fear co-creation

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

I have had a fantastic few weeks meeting some really interesting clients and agency people where we have been presenting & discussing co-creation. The first reaction in this type of meeting from advertising agencies and other experts in communication & design industries is hostility. To quote one advertising creative from a meeting this week “well if we hand over responsibility to the consumer we might as well get our p45’s and close down the office” I can understand this reaction and we might call this the “defensive expert” attitude. Because the training of most communication and design experts is based on creating value for their companies by owning
the science or magic of the creative process.

However I cannot help but be attracted to experts: creatives, planners, software architects, UX and fashion designers. I love them all: the nerdier, the better. It is a sheer joy to spend time with these people discovering their vocation and talent.

These kinds of experts love their jobs and they’re good at it and they can really inspire people. This is why this initial defensive reaction is to misunderstand the co-creation process and the important role they can play in it.
The trick for experts is to let go, to move from bottler of creativity to broker of knowledge and nurturer of ideas.

  • Inspire
    Experts play a fundamental role when working with consumers – they are there to inspire consumers to engage with the subject and the challenge. The best co-creation projects always involve a passionate expert and a great example of this is Anne Gotelbe who inspired consumer to develop the next Axe/Lynx fragrance.
  • Creative Talent Spotting
    Experts are also there to spot the golden nuggets of ideas or insights that can move the co-creation process on. In fact without this experienced trained eye co-creation would simply be a crowdsourcing exercise and we would be left with a sea of ideas. This involves editing and building on ideas, clustering, combining narrow and non visionary ideas into robust platforms, adding that crucial tweak that makes the idea really work for the client.
  • Nurture
    Finally experts are there to mentor consumers and nurture the ideas that resonate. They are ultimately responsible for taking the ideas developed with consumers and bringing them to life within companies.

Why Co-Creation Means Researchers Need to Change

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

0f63082793a8558f2fecd88a30ae7c11f4618724_m1 There is a backlash against co-creation from some parts of the industry because it requires researchers to take a different role. Co-creation means taking a step back ourselves, acting more as facilitators and enablers of direct contact between brands and consumers. We need to be provokers of debate, conduits for information, encouraging consumers and brands to think for themselves and to think and act together. This does not mean that the day of the debrief is dead, or that there is no place for insightful, objective, inspirational guidance from researchers. Instead it means that we need to see ourselves more as part of a triangular relationship between brands, people and researchers rather than a linear one where we stand between clients and consumers.

Of course, this all requires time and space to allow people to talk to each other and for brands to get involved in the conversation. We need time to build trust between people, and we need time to respond to and build on what people are saying. Crucially we need to accept that if consumers are going to become more equal partners in our approach to generating insight and innovation we need to build more continuous relationships with the people we are working with. This might mean spending two days working with consumers face to face or it can mean spending months or years working with particular communities of people. This is not about gathering a snapshot of opinion in a focus group or a hurriedly captured set of answers through a survey (as valuable as those methods remain), this is about working with people who are giving you the best of themselves, who move along the learning curve with you, who come to establish a relationship based on trust.

Probably the most significant principle that underpins our view of new ways of working with consumers is that interaction between people – whether consumers or brand owners – is absolutely vital. Fostering and participating in conversations between people is fundamental to the idea of co-creating insights and innovation. This is important in a number of different ways. Firstly it mirrors the way that we generally live as human beings – we are, after all, social animals. Secondly, it reflects the way we increasingly consume media and make decisions about what we buy, read, watch, and do. Thirdly it allows for a different kind of research landscape, one which subverts the traditional question and answer format – a relatively unfamiliar form of human communication and interaction – and replaces it with something far more natural and intuitive.

In this world consumers are encouraged to talk to each other rather than to researchers, opinions are offered, agreed with, disputed, challenged and developed. By working in a more natural communication mode we hear views expressed in real voices, and more importantly we end up discussing things and asking questions we didn’t even know existed or that we wanted to ask. This can lead to some “fortunate accidents” – insights that you have stumbled upon almost by chance. It is a reasonably good principle – though not always true – that if you know what question to ask you probably have a pretty good idea of what the answer is or might be. The mantra is simple: stop asking questions and start listening to conversations.

Face Co-creates ‘LATAM’ Style

Thursday, September 17th, 2009

Rio De Janeiro

Last week some of the Face team drew the short straw of getting involved in a project that meant I’d have to travel to Sao Paulo for a co-creation, God we hate our jobs sometimes!! This project involves 3 global brands within Unilever and 5 different countries, all to be delivered in 5 weeks, so it’s quite hectic but we love a challenge at Face.

So last Monday Face headed to Heathrow, took a couple of Valium, and boarded a flight to Sao Paulo… 14 hours later Face arrived in the lovely sunshine and went straight to bed to prepare for 3 busy days of co-creation.  So Face woke up raring to go on Tuesday to find a huge thunder storm, power had cut out; streets were flooded, never seen rain like it. Never mind Face didn’t let this dampen our spirits (sorry!!)

This co-creation is one of many international projects that Face has completed but for Lucy (who was one member of the team representing Face in Brazil)  it was only her second. Face really enjoys these experiences as the consumers you get to meet are so different. The women that attended the co-creation in Sao Paulo were so passionate and enthusiastic, that even though we were running a bit late they were happy to stay to work on their final ideas. It was a great day with some brilliant outputs to take to the next stage.

The next stage has just begun and it involves uploading concepts onto online communities in Argentina, Philippines and Thailand looking further into local market insights. Anyway we are currently in full flow with this so we better get back to work!